Are you comfortable speaking to stranger and I don't mean to panhandle or proselytize. Can you make connections between seemingly disparate things? Has your intelligence and talent gone unrecognized? Are you tired of having no control over your career and seeing other people succeed off your hard work? We should meet.
I am looking for exceptionally smart and motivated individuals to work in a fast paced Technology and Quant recruitment environment. My clientele includes TOP Investment Banks, High Frequency Trading Firms, Algorithmic Trading Firms and Web Startups, utilizing best of breed technologies. It is advantageous if you have a technology, finance or sales background, but I will consider individuals who are hungry, adaptable and willing to learn. While experience is preferred, I am willing to consider exceptional individuals who are recent graduates.
We can offer you the training and tools to succeed in business and make 75K year 1, 100K year 2, 150K year 3 and 200K year - these skills will be portable beyond just recruiting. This role can be like earning an MBA without going 100K in debt. Your efforts will have a direct link to the compensation you earn in a lucrative commission structure.
We expect intellectual curiosity, drive, fearlessness and a bunch of other cliched traits. This is definitely not for most people, but most things in life worth doing are rarely easy.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Monday, April 6, 2009
David Stern is a Jackass
I remember before the NBA season started, that due to the contraction of the US Economy and the expected declines in ticket / concession / memorabilia / merchandise / advertising / any other kind of Sales, the NBA was going to lay off roughly 10% of its workforce. What Stern, nor the other gutless wonders that make up the board of governors failed to realize was that owners like Mark Cuban and players like Charlie Villanueva, “The Big Hairless” would adopt new technologies like Twitter and adapt them to their marketing/self-promotion and create a whole new source of revenue for the league so Stern wouldn’t have to decide between laying off hard working people or going for his weekly manicure/pedicure and choosing what Rolex projected the image of success without rubbing it in people’s faces. Had David Stern left his ancient mindset for a second, he would have found ways to not only curb Cuban’s so-called disruptive and disrespectful behavior, but also help promote the sport, rather than being the butt end of rants such as this one - but I digress.
A moment on “Twitter” - I must admit that being a technology and finance recruiter, a take a great interest in web companies and wonder how they generate incredible excitement and somehow raise money (Facebook, thank you Microsoft) , while offering little intrinsic value to an investor except possibly hoping to raise ad revenues by serving a targeted ad that asks me if I want to enlarge my member or find the next great real estate deal. Twitter, on the other hand, has potential because thanks to texting and presidents who can neither pronounce the word “Nuclear,” nor pronounce any of the names of the leaders of the countries we fear amassing “Nuclear” arms, it is ok to now communicate in 140 characters and nonsensical quips. Twitter has tapped into the ADD of the nation.
Twitter has become the best tool for TheRealShaq (Shaq), the Big Hairless (Villanueva) and the Big Mouth (Cuban). The NBA has clamped down on the 1st amendment and has been fining Cuban and anyone else who doesn’t comply with their bland brand. Mark Cuban Rips Refs on Twitter Cuban should just write a blank check and Twitter away. While this is an unintended consequence, Twitter has become integral to the fundraising for Stern and his cronies. Had Stern been more of a technofile, he could have forseen this development and wouldn’t have had to lay off those hard working people who rely on the NBA for their subsistence. Now, instead of pocketing the money that comes from Cuban’s wallet, I think we should all challenge the NBA to give back, and not in a shamelessly self-promotional way (on camera). They should put all fines coming from Twitter related incidents into a scholarship fund for technosavvy individuals. Just my 2 cents.
Mark Cuban vs. Frau David Stern
A moment on “Twitter” - I must admit that being a technology and finance recruiter, a take a great interest in web companies and wonder how they generate incredible excitement and somehow raise money (Facebook, thank you Microsoft) , while offering little intrinsic value to an investor except possibly hoping to raise ad revenues by serving a targeted ad that asks me if I want to enlarge my member or find the next great real estate deal. Twitter, on the other hand, has potential because thanks to texting and presidents who can neither pronounce the word “Nuclear,” nor pronounce any of the names of the leaders of the countries we fear amassing “Nuclear” arms, it is ok to now communicate in 140 characters and nonsensical quips. Twitter has tapped into the ADD of the nation.
Twitter has become the best tool for TheRealShaq (Shaq), the Big Hairless (Villanueva) and the Big Mouth (Cuban). The NBA has clamped down on the 1st amendment and has been fining Cuban and anyone else who doesn’t comply with their bland brand. Mark Cuban Rips Refs on Twitter Cuban should just write a blank check and Twitter away. While this is an unintended consequence, Twitter has become integral to the fundraising for Stern and his cronies. Had Stern been more of a technofile, he could have forseen this development and wouldn’t have had to lay off those hard working people who rely on the NBA for their subsistence. Now, instead of pocketing the money that comes from Cuban’s wallet, I think we should all challenge the NBA to give back, and not in a shamelessly self-promotional way (on camera). They should put all fines coming from Twitter related incidents into a scholarship fund for technosavvy individuals. Just my 2 cents.
Mark Cuban vs. Frau David Stern
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Why the Georgia/Russia Conflict is all our problem
To the Global Community:
We’re at a crossroads. The last half-century has fostered great progress, prosperity and increasing globalization. Due to globalization, events in one region can have a direct impact both politically and financially on the stability of seemingly unrelated regions throughout the rest of the world. This is relevant to the recent hostilities between Authoritarian Russia, Putin and his followers (not the people of Russia), and the Republic of Georgia.
Please excuse the history lesson about the conflicted region. For centuries, the inhabitants of South Ossetia lived harmoniously as Georgians, but tensions began to escalate amid the rising nationalism among both Georgians and Ossetians in 1989 – Russia fomented desire in South Ossetia to secede from Georgia. Before this, these groups lived in peace except for the 1918-1920 events – both ethnicities had heavy interaction and intermarriage. Georgia retained control over parts of the region's eastern and southern districts where it created, in April 2007, a Provisional Administrative Entity of South Ossetia headed by ethnic Ossetians (former members of the separatist government) which would negotiate with central Georgian authorities regarding its final status and conflict resolution. While there have been setbacks to peace in this region, there has always been an effort to use diplomacy.
Russia has no interest in protecting the ethnic minority in South Ossetia, but is using this conflict as a chance to deploy troops and grab land, not unlike the Nazi annexation of the Sudetenland in 1936, a key contributor to World War II. The Kremlin claims to protect Russian ethnic minorities in the disputed regions from suffering at Georgian hands, but there is little to support these claims. If the Kremlin is allowed to strong arm the international community by threat of conflict and is allowed to intimidate the global powers to inaction, what will happen when this revitalized superpower decides it wants more? Will the world stand by as the hard fought gains that were realized through four decades of vigilance become lost by fear of conflict and the inability to act as we all know is just?
The Kremlin is using tensions between South Ossetia and Georgia to penetrate deep into Georgia proper with an eye on claiming an important pipeline. Russia covets this vital piece of infrastructure because it would greatly increase their petroleum profits. This would be catastrophic because the world economy would be hostage to Putin and the Kremlin’s greed. If the denial of a Visa for the Chief of the joint venture between BP and TNK, a Russian state-run oil company, is any indication of the Kremlin’s spirit of collaboration, foreign interests should beware
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/chief-of-bp-venture-forced-to-leave-russia/
At this moment, BP is diverting all oil flow away from this region for fear of Russian Nationalization of this infrastructure.
This is not just a fight for Georgia, but a fight to preserve the balance in the financial markets. The rest of the world will see an increase in the price of oil, natural gas and many other petroleum based products. This turmoil will increase costs beyond the very high prices being paid today to heat homes, offices and to fuel both consumer/commercial traffic. Not only is it ethically right to challenge the Kremlin, but it is also in our financial interest to do so. I urged you to participate in any way you see fit.
Very truly yours,
Friends of Georgia
We’re at a crossroads. The last half-century has fostered great progress, prosperity and increasing globalization. Due to globalization, events in one region can have a direct impact both politically and financially on the stability of seemingly unrelated regions throughout the rest of the world. This is relevant to the recent hostilities between Authoritarian Russia, Putin and his followers (not the people of Russia), and the Republic of Georgia.
Please excuse the history lesson about the conflicted region. For centuries, the inhabitants of South Ossetia lived harmoniously as Georgians, but tensions began to escalate amid the rising nationalism among both Georgians and Ossetians in 1989 – Russia fomented desire in South Ossetia to secede from Georgia. Before this, these groups lived in peace except for the 1918-1920 events – both ethnicities had heavy interaction and intermarriage. Georgia retained control over parts of the region's eastern and southern districts where it created, in April 2007, a Provisional Administrative Entity of South Ossetia headed by ethnic Ossetians (former members of the separatist government) which would negotiate with central Georgian authorities regarding its final status and conflict resolution. While there have been setbacks to peace in this region, there has always been an effort to use diplomacy.
Russia has no interest in protecting the ethnic minority in South Ossetia, but is using this conflict as a chance to deploy troops and grab land, not unlike the Nazi annexation of the Sudetenland in 1936, a key contributor to World War II. The Kremlin claims to protect Russian ethnic minorities in the disputed regions from suffering at Georgian hands, but there is little to support these claims. If the Kremlin is allowed to strong arm the international community by threat of conflict and is allowed to intimidate the global powers to inaction, what will happen when this revitalized superpower decides it wants more? Will the world stand by as the hard fought gains that were realized through four decades of vigilance become lost by fear of conflict and the inability to act as we all know is just?
The Kremlin is using tensions between South Ossetia and Georgia to penetrate deep into Georgia proper with an eye on claiming an important pipeline. Russia covets this vital piece of infrastructure because it would greatly increase their petroleum profits. This would be catastrophic because the world economy would be hostage to Putin and the Kremlin’s greed. If the denial of a Visa for the Chief of the joint venture between BP and TNK, a Russian state-run oil company, is any indication of the Kremlin’s spirit of collaboration, foreign interests should beware
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/chief-of-bp-venture-forced-to-leave-russia/
At this moment, BP is diverting all oil flow away from this region for fear of Russian Nationalization of this infrastructure.
This is not just a fight for Georgia, but a fight to preserve the balance in the financial markets. The rest of the world will see an increase in the price of oil, natural gas and many other petroleum based products. This turmoil will increase costs beyond the very high prices being paid today to heat homes, offices and to fuel both consumer/commercial traffic. Not only is it ethically right to challenge the Kremlin, but it is also in our financial interest to do so. I urged you to participate in any way you see fit.
Very truly yours,
Friends of Georgia
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Ivan Gevirtz' Blog
This blog deals with many things, among them are C++ development, Startups and Unit Testing.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
How you know it is time to leave your job
This is a great link that will provide food for thought when considering a job change.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
How to Write a Thank You Post Interview
This is a great link that outlines the correct etiquette of writing a thank you email.
Damon Carr's Agile Blog
This is a great resource for anyone interested in .NET 3.5 and Agile Development. Damon is a leader in the Agile world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
